But this notion of little victories has got me thinking. I am not interested in investigating things over which I have no control. The idea that students who are read to as five-year-olds do better than their peers in tests aged 16 is interesting, but doesn't help me greatly as an English teacher in a secondary school - unless, perhaps, I have a way of identifying who those children are. And even then it doesn't help me terribly much in terms of what to do with them.
What I am interested in doing is exploring the ways of stemming the decline in recreational reading amongst students in KS3 and KS4 in my own setting, where I do have some jurisdiction - certainly at curriculum level.
I have some hypotheses about the reasons for this decline. They are all to do, perhaps unsurprisingly, with things which are 'lacking' in some way:
- The lack of access to self-selected recreational reading books in a more sustained way than through the school library. This is largely due to reading Margaret Merga, and, in particular, Merga, M.K. (2015). Access to Books in the Home and Adolescent Engagement in Recreational Book Reading: Considerations for secondary school educators. English in Education. 49(3), pp. 197-214.I think I have been particularly influenced by this given my current experience as the mother of three primary school age children with constant supply of school books and the parental reading log, and the inevitable deficit comparisons I can make with the experience of my own students at secondary level. Merga also points to the dearth of research in this area at secondary level, so there may well be a gap here waiting to be filled.
- The lack of teacher knowledge about contemporary YA fiction. Cremin has been particularly influential here, though the research is located in the primary sector there are plenty of resonances with my own experience in a large secondary English department with a team of practitioners (myself included) who are predominantly literature experts; adept at analysing and teaching the ‘set text’. The switch from Othello to Hamlet for A level has meant a summer of critical reading for many of us. We are also avid wider readers, the majority of the English department are members of one or more book groups. Philipa Hunt is another exponent of the community, shared aspect of reading ‘But even as a keen adult reader, I depend on friends’ recommendations for many of the books I read’ (Hunt, p86) But, this does not mean that they are really aware of YA fiction. How does this link with teacher theoretical knowledge about the teaching of reading itself? And the notion of teacher identity? This is also related to the policy context – the ‘gap’ arising from limitations in National Literacy Strategy.
- The lack of value placed on recreational reading in the curriculum itself, combined with the 'lip-service' paid in extra-curricular terms to interventions designed to encourage reading for pleasure - the author visits, competitions, reading passports, DEAR, and other events that go on throughout the school year. There is no authenticity in terms of building a reading community from the inside. (There is some Cremin influence here, too.) What can be done in curriculum terms to redress this?
- The lack of good contemporary reading opportunities resulting from the narrowing of the curriculum, at KS4 in particular, which has removed some of the 'big-hitters' in terms of student engagement and motivation and replaced them with more challenging and less immediately accessible pre 1900 texts. This is linked with Cliff Hodges' idea, from Researching and Teaching Reading by Gabrielle Cliff Hodges Routledge, Abingdon 2016 that 'It is ironic that one possible reason for these students forgetting how to read novels is literature teaching itself, especially if novels are viewed as set texts instead of narratives written to be read for pleasure.’ (Cliff Hodges, 2016, p93)
- The lack of respect for keen readers within the existing community. Again, inspired by Cliff Hodges and her reading of Paul Gee, noting that in one setting, ‘The fact that the adults use the same derogatory terminology as the students, even though they are group leaders of this scheme who might be expected to eschew such a simplistic perception, serves to reinforce Gee’s point about the power of figured worlds such as these and the importance of discourse analysis in helping us to make them visible and understand them’ (Cliff Hodges, 2016, p123)
So these are the places where I want to be able to arrange some little victories. The next question is 'how'?
My supervisors have also been setting up some victories for me: in the timeline created at my last supervision meeting we have plotted out a route which includes the literature review for the proposal being complete by January. Gulp.
No comments:
Post a Comment